Exact historical dictionary sense

Lost in Webster's 1913 dictionary

The 1913 record labels lost as adjective. Its source-bounded etymology and selected historical definition appear below.

WEBSTER 1913adjective
Lost

[Prop. p. p. of OE. losien. See Lose, v. t.]

Cross-verified historical sense
The source text may be outdated. The page preserves that historical boundary.
Cross-verified 1913 record
Headwordlost
Part of speechadjective
Historical etymology[Prop. p. p. of OE. losien. See Lose, v. t.]
Selected historical definitionParted with unwillingly or unintentionally; not to be found; missing; as, a lost book or sheep.
Signed record IDwebster1913-lost-adjective-816903045326
Source locatorCIDE.L, paragraph 6747; Gutenberg eBook 664
Edition-scoped answerNot earliest-attestation proofNot modern consensus
Quick answer

In Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913), "lost" is labeled adjective. Its etymology is recorded as: "[Prop. p. p. of OE. losien. See Lose, v. t.]" The selected historical definition says: "Parted with unwillingly or unintentionally; not to be found; missing; as, a lost book or sheep."

Project Gutenberg Webster 1913 plus signed GNU GCIDE 0.54 Exact cross-verified historical record reviewed 2026-09-05

What this answer proves

One named sense in one historical dictionary edition.

The answer reports the selected headword, part of speech, etymology, definition, and source locator as transcribed in the cross-verified 1913 record.

Evidence boundaryIt does not establish the earliest attestation or a complete borrowing chain.It does not claim current scholarly consensus or a modern dictionary definition.Historical dictionary text may be obsolete, incomplete, inaccurate, or offensive by modern standards.

More released L records

Every card owns a different source record and historical sense.

Browse released L records - browse all historical records.